tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1653526062696504766.post2916817268660415379..comments2023-10-17T08:38:19.606-04:00Comments on Crazy Bitches R Us: Ottawa looks to redefine rules for Indian statusWard of the Statehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07696377190010219356noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1653526062696504766.post-91492297732595898782009-06-03T09:17:40.371-04:002009-06-03T09:17:40.371-04:00If she appeals to the Supreme Court and loses will...If she appeals to the Supreme Court and loses will the arguments used to get her this far in the courts be gone forever? I heard that once an argument is used and a court judgement finds against its validity it cannot be re-entered into a court for another “go-round” if you will. And if she chooses to accept the findings can other court cases use this case as a spring board or a launch pad? In Wideyehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09527517107982733944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1653526062696504766.post-62827421436453002272009-06-03T09:00:09.042-04:002009-06-03T09:00:09.042-04:00That's it wideye. I am no legal wiz, but I hav...That's it wideye. I am no legal wiz, but I have been told the decision was very narrow. <br /><br />About a year ago a lower court ruled the 1985 amendments to the Indian Act continued the discrimination against First Nations women and their children on the basis of sex because it treated women who married out before April 17, 1982 differently than men who had married non-Indian women before Ward of the Statehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07696377190010219356noreply@blogger.com